A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi observed that the matter pertained to policy formulation and therefore did not warrant judicial intervention. The Court declined to interfere with a November 2025 order of the Bombay High Court, which had already dismissed the petition on similar grounds.
During the proceedings, the bench made it clear that determining the name of an airport falls within the domain of the executive and not the judiciary. The Court remarked, “Is it the function of the court that what should be the name of an airport?” thereby reinforcing its position against entering into policy decisions.
The bench further granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedies before the competent authority, effectively closing the door on judicial intervention in the matter at this stage while leaving administrative channels open for further representation.
The ruling underscores the judiciary’s consistent stance on maintaining the separation of powers, particularly in matters involving governmental naming decisions and administrative policy. By refusing to entertain the plea, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that such decisions lie within the executive framework and are not subject to judicial direction unless clear legal violations are demonstrated.
About The Author
Comment List